Skip to main content

MultiMNIST with CNN

Created on October 26|Last edited on October 26

Best results:


05101520Step0.050.10.150.20.25
05101520Step0.40.50.60.70.8
05101520Step0.90.920.940.960.98
05101520Step0.750.80.850.90.95
05101520Step0.10.120.140.160.180.20.22
05101520Step0.40.50.60.70.80.9
Run set
8


"Complete match" accuracy:

  • It reaches total 80% at max, which is huge as compared to MLP for same task.

Other comparisions:



Run set
9

Observations are:
  • Stride 1 gives almost all good accuracies. I makes sense as our model also has pooling in it.
  • Higher kernel sizes give better results. This is reasonable as we have 64x64 image now, and only 2 pooling is not enough to summarise features all over image. Larger kernel also result in more complex patterns detected.
  • Smaller lr is better.
  • Dropout is prefered but <= 0.3 is optimal.