Skip to main content

BC03 3DoF, 1 Sphere, Compare Effect of #Demos

For different methods, compare the effect of # of training data points.
Created on May 20|Last edited on May 27
  • I ran PN++ naively with 10 demos to see what it would give us and to possibly see if we get better results with denser representations (sample efficiency).
  • These are with the v02 data, BTW, WITHOUT zero-padding.
  • Hmm ... seems like success is worse with 10 demos, but not that much worse.
  • Why are these susceptible to CUDA malloc errors on the cluster?
    • 10 demos: I had to remove 2 of 5. Re-running 2 more on 05/21/2022.
    • 100 demos: I had to remove 1 of 5. Re-running 1 more on 05/21/2022.
    • Update: the above should now be accounted for and resolved in reporting results.

PN++ 10 and 100 Demo Comparisons


050100150200250Step00.20.40.60.81
050100150200250Step00.20.40.60.81
Group PN++ Naive (10 Demos)
Group PN++ Naive (100 Demos)
PN++ Naive (10 Demos)
5
PN++ Naive (100 Demos)
5