Skip to main content

Altryne's workspace

baseline_results-morg
3
4143915
a
In this case, the citation 'a' refers to the case of United States v. Mitchell, 502 F.3d 931, 991, where the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality of Section 354(3) of the Indian Penal Code and held that a court cannot issue a writ of certiorari against a final judgment of the Supreme Court after dismissal of a review petition. The citation 'b' refers to the case of United States v. Caro, 461 F.Supp.2d 459, 465, where the court allowed the government to present mitigating circumstances to the jury during the sentencing phase of the trial. 
case_id
label
prediction
1
4143915
a
The correct answer is 'a'. In the provided case, the court allowed the publication of witness testimony during the trial, stating that it does not violate the right to fair trial under Article 32(1) as long as the court can still hold a trial. However, the court did not explicitly address the issue of pre-trial publicity, stating only that 'the petitioners failed to controvert the contents of the newspaper article.' Therefore, the question of whether the publication of witness testimony during the trial violates the right to fair trial under Article 32(1) was not directly addressed in this case. 
case_id
label
prediction
1
4143915
a
The correct citation is 'a'. 
case_id
label
prediction
1
Tables
5
context
label
prediction
case_id
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
List<Maybe<File<(table)>>>
List<Maybe<File<(table)>>>
List<Maybe<File<(table)>>>
List<Maybe<File<(table)>>>