Skip to main content

EU AI Act Compliance Report

Comprehensive compliance report for the Hiring Assistant system
Created on March 26|Last edited on March 26

EU AI Act Compliance Report

Generated on: 2025-03-26 14:51:31




Select runs that logged gender_distribution
to visualize data in this bar chart.
Select runs that logged nationality_distribution
to visualize data in this bar chart.
Select runs that logged Count
to visualize data in this line chart.
Run set
46


1. System Overview

  • Intended Purpose: AI-powered candidate evaluation system for recruitment
  • Architecture: Two-model cascade system
    • Extraction Model (GPT-4o-mini): Parses CVs and positions into structured data
    • Comparison Model (GPT-4o): Evaluates candidate suitability
  • Risk Classification: High-risk AI system (Article 6(2) and Annex III(4)(a))


2. Data Governance

  • Dataset Size: 20 candidate profiles
  • Data Quality Score (R-Score): 0.00
  • Data Distribution:
    • Gender: {'Female': 13, 'Male': 7}
    • Nationality: {'Nigeria': 5, 'India': 4, 'UK': 3, 'Germany': 3, 'Brazil': 3, 'US': 2}
    • Age: Mean=42.5, Std=12.3
  • Data Lineage: Tracked through W&B Artifacts
  • Version Control: Managed via W&B Registry


3. Model Development

  • Training Pipeline:
    • Data Preprocessing: Automated extraction and structuring
    • Model Fine-tuning: GPT-4o with custom training data
    • Hyperparameter Optimization: Automated via W&B Sweeps
  • Performance Metrics:
    • Decision Accuracy: 0.00%
    • Reasoning Quality: 0.00%
    • Hallucination Rate: 0.00%
  • Guardrails:
    • Hallucination Detection
    • PII Masking
    • Decision-Reasoning Alignment


4. Evaluation and Testing

  • Automated Testing:
    • Decision Match Evaluation
    • Reasoning Quality Assessment
    • Hallucination Detection
  • Human Oversight:
    • Manual Review Interface
    • Appeal Process
    • Feedback Collection
  • Continuous Monitoring:
    • Performance Metrics
    • Bias Detection
    • Data Drift Analysis


5. Technical Documentation

  • Model Architecture Documentation
  • Training Process Details
  • Evaluation Methodology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Mitigation Strategies
  • Compliance Evidence


6. Recommendations for Compliance

  1. Regular bias audits and monitoring
  2. Enhanced transparency documentation
  3. Expanded dataset diversity
  4. Improved human review process
  5. Regular compliance updates
  6. Automated compliance reporting



Run set
46