Skip to main content

An introduction to tokenization in natural language processing

This comprehensive guide explores the essential tokenization techniques that underpin effective natural language processing, empowering NLP practitioners to make informed choices.
Created on April 14|Last edited on May 29

Introduction to tokenization in NLP

Tokenization is a fundamental preprocessing step in natural language processing (NLP) that breaks down a piece of text, such as a sentence or a paragraph, into smaller, more manageable units called tokens.
These tokens—which can be individual words, characters, or subwords—serve as the building blocks for various NLP tasks, from classification to machine translation.
The process of tokenization is crucial for bridging the gap between the unstructured nature of human language and the structured requirements of computational algorithms. By breaking down text into smaller, more digestible components, tokenization enables computers to better understand and process linguistic information, paving the way for more advanced NLP applications.
Source: Author
Tokenization plays a vital role in the field of NLP, as it forms the foundation for a wide range of tasks, including:
  1. Text classification: Tokenization is a crucial preprocessing step for text classification models, where the tokenized text is used as input for the classifier.
  2. Machine translation: Tokenization is essential for machine translation systems, as it allows the source text to be broken down into units that can be translated and then reassembled in the target language.
  3. Sentiment analysis: Tokenization helps identify the individual words or phrases that contribute to the overall sentiment expressed in a piece of text.
  4. Named entity recognition: Tokenization is used to identify and extract relevant entities, such as people, organizations, or locations, from the input text.
  5. Language modeling: Tokenization is a key component in language modeling, where the tokenized text is used to train models that can generate or predict natural language.
By understanding the importance of tokenization and the various techniques available, NLP practitioners can make informed decisions about the best approach to use in their projects, leading to more accurate and efficient processing of human language data.

The necessity of tokenization in NLP

Raw text data is a continuous stream of characters that includes not only words but also numbers, symbols, and punctuation. This complexity poses a significant challenge for computers, which are designed to process structured data.
Tokenization enables machines to break down the unstructured nature of text into more manageable components, unlocking the ability to perform advanced natural language processing tasks. This crucial step lays the foundation for a wide range of NLP applications, from text classification and machine translation to sentiment analysis and language modeling.
Simply put, without tokenization, computers would struggle to comprehend the underlying meaning and structure of natural language. They would be unable to differentiate individual words, identify sentence boundaries, or recognize the relationships between different linguistic elements. This lack of understanding would severely limit the ability of NLP systems to perform tasks such as:
  1. Information retrieval: Tokenization is essential for search engines to match user queries with relevant documents by breaking down the text into searchable units.
  2. Text generation: Tokenization allows language models to generate coherent and grammatically correct text by understanding the sequence and structure of the input.
  3. Grammatical analysis: Tokenization is a prerequisite for tasks like part-of-speech tagging and dependency parsing, which require a deep understanding of the grammatical structure of the text.
  4. Semantic understanding: Tokenization is the foundation for semantic analysis, enabling NLP systems to extract meaning and relationships from the text.
Converting the continuous stream of characters into a structured set of tokens, tokenization lays the groundwork for a wide range of NLP applications, allowing computers to effectively process, understand, and generate human language. This preprocessing step is, therefore, a crucial and indispensable component of any robust NLP pipeline.

Overview of tokenization techniques

Source
ML engineers employ a host of tokenization strategies, but we can break the major one down into the three separate categories:

Word-level tokenization

The most straightforward approach to tokenization is word-level tokenization, which breaks down text into individual words based on whitespace or punctuation. This method is widely used and forms the foundation for many traditional NLP techniques, such as TF-IDF and the now-archaic bag of words.

Subword tokenization:

While word-level tokenization is effective for many use cases, it can struggle with handling rare or out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words.
Subword tokenization techniques—such as Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and SentencePiece—address this challenge by segmenting words into smaller, more common subword units. This approach allows for better generalization and improved performance on tasks involving diverse vocabularies.

Character-level tokenization:

In contrast to word-level and subword tokenization, character-level tokenization breaks down text into individual characters.
This approach is particularly useful for languages with no clear word boundaries, such as Chinese or Japanese, or for specialized applications that require a more granular level of analysis, such as spelling correction or language modeling.
The choice of tokenization technique depends on the specific requirements of the NLP project. Word-level tokenization may be sufficient for many tasks, but subword and character-level tokenization can be more effective in handling rare words, diverse vocabularies, and complex language structures.

Tokenization tools and libraries

The NLP ecosystem offers a variety of well-established libraries and tools that provide robust tokenization capabilities. Let's explore a few of the prominent ones:

NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit):

NLTK is a comprehensive Python library for NLP tasks, including tokenization. It offers a wide range of tokenizers, such as word_tokenize and sent_tokenize, making it a popular choice for educational and research purposes. NLTK's tokenization approach is straightforward and easy to use, making it an accessible option for beginners in the field of NLP.

spaCy:

spaCy is a modern, efficient NLP library that prioritizes speed and performance. It provides advanced tokenization capabilities that account for linguistic structure and context, making it a preferred choice for production-ready applications. spaCy's tokenization is more sophisticated than NLTK's, handling complex cases like contractions and providing additional linguistic annotations.

HuggingFace Tokenizers:

The HuggingFace Tokenizers library offers access to the tokenizers used by popular transformer-based models, such as BERT, GPT, and T5. This ensures consistency between the tokenization used during pre-training and fine-tuning, a crucial aspect for advanced NLP tasks.
Each of these providers offers unique strengths and features, catering to different needs and use cases within the NLP domain. NLTK's simplicity makes it a great choice for educational and exploratory purposes, while spaCy's performance and linguistic awareness make it suitable for production-ready applications. Hugging Face Tokenizers, on the other hand, excel at handling the complexities of advanced NLP models, ensuring seamless integration with state-of-the-art architectures.
By understanding the capabilities and trade-offs of these tokenization providers, NLP practitioners can make informed decisions about the most appropriate tool for their specific project requirements.

Practical guide: Implementing different tokenization strategies

Now that we've explored the theoretical aspects of tokenization techniques and the various providers in the NLP ecosystem, let's dive into the practical implementation of these methods.
To get started, we'll set up a Python environment with the necessary libraries installed. You can use a tool like pip to install NLTK, spaCy, and Hugging Face's Transformers library. Make sure to have the required dependencies installed and your environment set up before proceeding with the examples.

NLTK tokenization example

import nltk
nltk.download('punkt')
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize


text = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog."
tokens = word_tokenize(text)
print(tokens)
This simple example demonstrates how to use NLTK's word_tokenize function to break down a given text into individual word tokens.

spaCy tokenization example:

import spacy


nlp = spacy.load("en_core_web_sm")
doc = nlp("The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.")


# Tokenize the document
tokens = [token.text for token in doc]
print(tokens)
In this example, we use spaCy to tokenize the input text. spaCy's tokenization is more sophisticated than NLTK's, as it takes into account the linguistic structure of the text and handles complex cases like contractions.

HuggingFace tokenization example:

from transformers import BertTokenizer


tokenizer = BertTokenizer.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased")
text = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog."
tokens = tokenizer.tokenize(text)
print(tokens)
This example demonstrates the use of Hugging Face's BERT tokenizer, which employs a subword tokenization technique called WordPiece. This approach is particularly effective in handling rare and out-of-vocabulary words, making it a popular choice for advanced NLP tasks.

Comparing Tokenization Outputs

The outputs of the three tokenization examples demonstrate the differences in how each library approaches the task. Let's take a closer look at the differences:

NLTK Tokenization:


NLTK's word_tokenize function uses a straightforward approach to tokenization. It splits the input text into individual tokens based on whitespace and punctuation characters. This is a widely-used and intuitive method of tokenization, as it aligns well with the way humans naturally break down text into words.
Under the hood, NLTK's word_tokenize uses a set of regular expressions to identify token boundaries. It looks for patterns such as:
  • Sequences of alphabetic characters (e.g., "the", "quick")
  • Numbers (e.g., "123")
  • Punctuation marks (e.g., ".", ",", "!")
The function then returns a list of these identified tokens, preserving the original order and structure of the input text.
However, the simplicity of NLTK's word-level tokenization also presents some limitations. It can struggle with handling more complex linguistic phenomena, such as contractions, abbreviations, or words with special characters. In such cases, the tokenizer may split the text in ways that don't align with the intended meaning or structure of the language.
This straightforward approach to tokenization makes NLTK's word_tokenize a great choice for simple NLP tasks, where the focus is on working with individual words. It provides a clean and easily interpretable representation of the text, which can be useful for tasks like word frequency analysis, bag-of-words modeling, and basic text classification.

spaCy Tokenization:


spaCy's tokenization approach is more sophisticated than NLTK's simple word-level tokenization. Instead of relying solely on whitespace and punctuation, spaCy's tokenizer takes a more comprehensive approach that accounts for the linguistic structure of the input text.
At the core of spaCy's tokenization is a statistical model trained on large corpora of natural language data. This model learns patterns and rules for identifying token boundaries, handling contractions, and preserving important linguistic features.
spaCy's tokenization also preserves information about the original whitespace and punctuation, which can be useful for downstream tasks that require preserving the formatting and layout of the text.
Furthermore, spaCy's tokenizer is designed to be highly efficient and performant, making it a suitable choice for real-world NLP applications that need to process large volumes of text data. The library's modular architecture allows for easy integration with other components of its comprehensive NLP pipeline, such as part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, and dependency parsing.
The increased sophistication of spaCy's tokenization comes at the cost of a slightly more complex implementation compared to NLTK's straightforward approach. However, this trade-off often pays off in terms of improved performance and better handling of complex linguistic phenomena, especially in production-ready NLP systems.

Hugging Face Tokenization:


The Hugging Face example showcases subword tokenization, where words are segmented into smaller, more common units. In this case, the tokens are still mostly individual words, but the approach is designed to handle rare and out-of-vocabulary words more effectively.
The HuggingFace tokenizer, specifically the one used by the BERT model, employs a more advanced tokenization approach called Wordpiece tokenization, which is a type of subword tokenization.
Unlike NLTK's simple word-level tokenization or spaCy's more comprehensive linguistic approach, the Hugging Face tokenizer breaks down the input text into smaller subword units, rather than just full words.
The Wordpiece tokenization algorithm works as follows:
  1. It starts with a vocabulary of individual characters.
  2. It then iteratively finds the most common pair of tokens (either characters or subwords) and merges them into a new subword token.
  3. This process continues until the desired vocabulary size is reached.
The resulting vocabulary contains a mix of full words and common subword units. When presented with new text, the tokenizer will split words into the smallest possible combination of these subword tokens.
This subword tokenization approach is particularly effective at handling rare and out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words. Instead of treating these words as completely unknown and assigning them a generic "unknown" token, the Hugging Face tokenizer can break them down into known subword units, allowing the model to still learn meaningful representations for these words.
For example, the word "jumping" might be tokenized as "jump" and "##ing", where the "##" prefix indicates that the token is a continuation of the previous one. This enables the model to understand the morphological structure of the word and learn its meaning, even if the full word was not present in the training data.
The Hugging Face tokenizer's focus on subword units, rather than full words, makes it well-suited for advanced NLP tasks, such as those involving transformer-based models like BERT. By handling rare and OOV words more effectively, the subword tokenization approach can improve the model's performance and generalization capabilities.
These differences in tokenization output can have significant implications for downstream NLP tasks. Word-level tokenization, as seen in NLTK and spaCy, may be sufficient for many applications, but subword tokenization, as demonstrated by Hugging Face, can be more effective in handling the complexities of natural language, especially for advanced models and diverse datasets.
The choice of tokenization technique should be guided by the specific requirements of your NLP project. Factors such as the language, the complexity of the text, and the target task should all be considered when selecting the most appropriate tokenization method.

Conclusion: Choosing the right tokenization technique

Selecting the appropriate tokenization method is a crucial decision in the NLP development process. The choice should be guided by factors such as the language, the complexity of the text, and the specific requirements of the NLP task at hand.
Throughout this article, we've explored the landscape of tokenization techniques, from the straightforward word-level tokenization to the more advanced subword and character-level approaches. Each method offers unique advantages, catering to different project requirements and data characteristics.
Whether you're working on text classification, machine translation, or any other NLP task, understanding the trade-offs and selecting the right tokenization technique can make a substantial difference in the performance and robustness of your models. By making an informed decision, you can ensure that your NLP systems are well-equipped to handle the complexities of natural language and deliver meaningful results.
Iterate on AI agents and models faster. Try Weights & Biases today.