Deep reinforcement learning: Integrating neural networks with RL
Explore how deep reinforcement learning combines neural networks and RL to enable agents to learn optimal strategies from raw data across gaming and robotics.
Created on April 7|Last edited on June 17
Comment
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) integrates Reinforcement Learning (RL) with deep neural networks, enabling agents to learn decision strategies through interaction with complex environments. This method drives advances in robotics, gaming, finance, autonomous vehicles, and resource management - just to name a few.
By combining trial-and-error feedback with the pattern-recognition power of neural networks, deep reinforcement learning removes the need for manual feature engineering. From raw pixels in video games to real-time sensor data on robots, it enables systems to discover effective behaviors autonomously. As DRL continues to mature, it offers new opportunities for adaptive AI across industries.

What is deep reinforcement learning?
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a machine learning approach that combines reinforcement learning with deep neural networks, enabling agents to learn optimal policies directly from high-dimensional inputs. Unlike other methods, DRL maps raw data to actions through trial and error.
Reinforcement learning is a feedback-driven process in which an agent observes a state, takes an action, and receives a reward or penalty. Traditional RL often relies on low-dimensional representations, such as positions on a grid or hand-crafted features. By contrast, deep reinforcement learning uses a neural network as a function approximator to process raw inputs (ex: pixel data or continuous sensor readings) and estimate values or action probabilities. This integration allows agents to generalize across vast state spaces without manual preprocessing.
As illustrated here, raw sensory inputs (camera, LiDAR, radar, etc.) feed into a neural policy network, which outputs steering, acceleration, waypoints and more.”

Source: S. L. Brunton (2021, February 19), Neural Networks for Learning Control Laws

How do Deep Reinforcement learning agents improve their behavior ?
Deep reinforcement learning agents refine their behavior through a continuous cycle of observation, action, reward, and network update. Over time, they adjust their policies to maximize cumulative reward by learning which actions yield the best long-term outcomes.
1. Agent and environment
- Agent: The learner (for example, a game AI or robot controller).
- Environment: The world in which it operates (such as a traffic network or virtual arena).
2. States, actions and rewards
- State : A snapshot of the environment at time t (e.g., camera feed or sensor values).
- Action : A decision the agent makes (for example, steer left or jump).
- Reward : Feedback from the environment indicating success or failure.
3. Learning loop
- Observe state
- Choose action based on the policy or value estimate.
- Execute action and receive reward and new state
- Update neural network parameters via gradient-based methods to improve future estimates.
By incorporating the reward signal into the network’s loss function—often via variants of temporal-difference learning—DRL agents strengthen connections that lead to high rewards and weaken those that cause penalties.
So, we know DRL uses neural networks to handle complex situations. But how does the actual learning and improvement happen? It boils down to a continuous cycle of interaction and refinement, driven by feedback. Let's unpack the key players and the process:

The Core Components:
- Agent: This is the learner, the AI making decisions (e.g., the self-driving car controller, the game-playing AI).
- Environment: This is the world the agent interacts with (e.g., the road network and traffic, the video game world).
- State (s): A snapshot of the environment at a particular moment, providing the context for the agent's decision (e.g., current sensor readings, screen pixels). In DRL, this state is often complex and high-dimensional.
- Action (a): A choice the agent makes based on the current state (e.g., steer left, accelerate, jump, buy/sell).
- Reward (r): A feedback signal from the environment indicating the immediate consequence of the agent's action in that state. It can be positive (a reward for good performance) or negative (a penalty for poor performance).
The Learning Loop (Trial-and-Error):
The learning process is an ongoing loop:
- The agent observes the current state (s) of the environment.
- Based on this state, the agent's neural network (its policy or value estimator) decides on an action (a).
- The agent performs the action (a).
- The environment transitions to a new state (s') and provides a reward (r) back to the agent.
- The agent uses this reward signal and the transition information (s, a, r, s') to update its neural network, refining its decision-making process for the future.
This cycle – observe state, take action, receive reward, observe new state – repeats continuously. The reward signal is the crucial for learning. The agent's goal isn't just to grab the biggest immediate reward, but to maximize the total cumulative reward collected over time. It uses the feedback (s, a, r, s') from each interaction to incrementally update its neural network. The neural network's parameters (weights and biases) are adjusted iteratively using algorithms (like variations of gradient descent informed by the reward signal) so that its outputs – whether they are action values or action probabilities – increasingly lead to decisions that maximize this long-term expected reward. Actions leading to rewards strengthen the likelihood of taking similar actions in similar situations, while actions leading to penalties are discouraged.
Exploration vs Exploitation dilemma
Learning effectively isn't just about repeating what worked before. Agents face the critical exploration vs. exploitation dilemma. Should the agent exploit its current knowledge by choosing the action it currently believes is best based on past experience? Think of this like going to your favorite restaurant – you know the food is good, it's a safe bet. Or should it explore by trying different, perhaps seemingly worse, actions to gather more information and potentially discover superior strategies it doesn't yet know about? This is like trying a brand-new restaurant down the street – it might be disappointing, or it could become your new favorite, offering even better rewards in the long run.
Sticking only to exploitation might mean the agent gets stuck with a decent but suboptimal strategy (always eating at the same okay restaurant), while exploring too much can be inefficient (never settling on a good option). DRL agents must navigate this trade-off, often employing methods that encourage more exploration early on when knowledge is limited, and gradually shifting towards exploitation as they become more confident in their learned strategies.
Practically, these concepts are often implemented using programming languages like Python, leveraging libraries such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and specialized RL frameworks (like RLlib or Stable Baselines3) that provide tools for building environments, defining neural networks, and running these learning algorithms.
Components and Mathematical Foundations of Reinforcement Learning
We've seen how Deep Reinforcement Learning agents learn through a continuous cycle of interaction, driven by rewards and guided by the need to balance exploration with exploitation. To truly grasp how this works, especially as problems scale, it helps to understand the underlying framework and terminology borrowed from classical Reinforcement Learning. While DRL uses powerful neural networks, these networks operate within a well-defined structure. Let's formalize the key pieces we've encountered and introduce the mathematical foundations they rest upon.

Source: S. L. Brunton (2021, February 19), Neural Networks for Learning Control Laws
We've already met the core players: the Agent (the learner) and the Environment (the world it acts within). Their interaction unfolds over discrete time steps through States (), Actions (), and Rewards (). At each time step , the agent observes state , takes action , transitions to state , and receives reward . Beyond these, two crucial concepts guide the agent's learning:
- Policy (): This is the agent's strategy or "brain." It defines the agent's behavior. Mathematically, it's a mapping from states to probabilities of selecting each possible action. A deterministic policy maps each state to a single action (), while a stochastic policy maps each state to a probability distribution over actions (). In DRL, the policy is often directly represented by the parameters () of a neural network, . The goal of learning is essentially to find the optimal policy () that maximizes the expected cumulative future reward.
- Value Functions: These functions estimate "how good" it is for the agent to be in a particular state, or to take a particular action in a state, under a given policy . They are crucial because they allow the agent to look beyond immediate rewards and make decisions based on long-term potential.
- The State-Value Function is the expected return (sum of discounted future rewards) starting from state and subsequently following policy . Formally: It answers: "Following policy , what is the expected long-term reward from this state ?"
- The Action-Value Function (often called the Q-function) is the expected return starting from state , taking action , and then subsequently following policy . Formally: It answers: "Following policy after taking action in state , what is the expected long-term reward?" These value functions are interconnected through the famous Bellman equations, which express the value of a state (or state-action pair) in terms of the expected immediate reward plus the discounted value of the successor state(s). This recursive relationship forms the basis for many RL algorithms.
This entire interaction process is typically formalized using the framework of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). An MDP provides a mathematical way to model sequential decision-making problems where outcomes are partly random and partly controllable. An MDP is formally defined by a tuple :
- : A finite or infinite set of states.
- : A finite or infinite set of actions.
- : The state transition probability function, . This defines the dynamics of the environment.
- : The reward function, often defined as the expected immediate reward upon transitioning from state with action , . Sometimes it's defined based on the resulting state as well: .
- : The discount factor (). This scalar determines the present value of future rewards. A close to 0 makes the agent "short-sighted," focusing only on immediate rewards, while a close to 1 makes it value future rewards highly, essential for long-term planning.
A key assumption underlying MDPs is the Markov Property: the probability of transitioning to the next state and receiving reward depends only on the current state and action , not on the history of previous states and actions. Formally: . Think of it like chess: the possible outcomes of the next move depend only on the current board configuration, not the sequence of moves that led there. While this property might not hold perfectly in all complex real-world scenarios (making them Partially Observable MDPs or POMDPs), the MDP framework provides a powerful and foundational model.
The agent's objective is to find a policy that maximizes the expected discounted sum of rewards, often called the expected return, starting from an initial state distribution.
In the context of DRL, the state space (and sometimes action space ) can be enormous or continuous. Explicitly calculating and storing or for every possible and becomes impossible. This is where deep neural networks shine. DRL uses neural networks, parameterized by weights , as powerful function approximators to estimate the optimal policy , the optimal state-value function , or most commonly, the optimal action-value function . The network learns a compact representation that can generalize across similar states, enabling intelligent decision-making even in environments with vast state spaces, effectively bridging the gap between the formal MDP framework and the complexities of real-world applications.
Strengths and Weakness of Deep Reinforcement Learning
Now that we have a better handle on how Deep Reinforcement Learning works under the hood, combining Reinforcement Learning principles with the power of deep neural networks, it's time to look at its practical implications. Like any powerful technology, DRL comes with a unique set of advantages that make it incredibly exciting, but also some significant challenges that researchers and practitioners are actively working to overcome. Understanding both sides of the coin is crucial for appreciating where DRL shines and where caution is needed.
The Strengths
Perhaps the most celebrated strength of DRL is its remarkable ability to tackle problems with extremely complex, high-dimensional state spaces. Think back to learning from raw pixels in a video game or sensor data from a robot – environments where traditional RL methods would falter. Because DRL uses deep neural networks, it can learn meaningful representations and policies directly from this raw, often unstructured, data without needing humans to painstakingly engineer specific features. This opens the door to solving problems previously considered intractable.
Furthermore, DRL agents demonstrate impressive adaptability in dynamic environments. They learn through interaction and can potentially adjust their strategies as the environment changes, unlike systems relying solely on pre-programmed rules. This makes them well-suited for real-world scenarios where conditions are rarely static. From navigating unpredictable traffic to responding to fluctuating market conditions, DRL offers a path towards more robust and flexible AI systems. This ability has led to groundbreaking successes, such as Google DeepMind's AlphaGo defeating world champion Go players, AI mastering complex video games like Dota 2 and StarCraft II, achieving sophisticated control in robotics, and even optimizing energy usage in Google's data centers.
The Weaknesses
Despite its power, DRL is not a magic bullet. One of the most significant challenges is sample inefficiency. Learning effective policies, especially in complex environments, often requires a massive amount of interaction data – millions or even billions of trials. Collecting this data can be time-consuming, expensive, or even dangerous in real-world settings (imagine a robot learning purely by trial-and-error near fragile objects or humans). This often necessitates the use of simulators for initial training, which introduces the potential for a "reality gap" where policies trained in simulation don't transfer perfectly to the real world.
Another major hurdle is training stability and convergence. The interplay between the learning agent, the neural network function approximator, and the environment dynamics can sometimes lead to unstable learning processes. Training might diverge, performance can oscillate wildly, or the agent might converge to a poor, suboptimal policy. Ensuring stable and reliable convergence often requires careful algorithm selection, hyperparameter tuning, and sophisticated techniques, making the training process more of an art than a science at times.
DRL systems can also be notoriously computationally demanding. Training deep neural networks on vast amounts of data requires significant computing power, often involving specialized hardware like GPUs or TPUs, and can take days, weeks, or even longer. This limits accessibility for those without substantial resources.
Finally, debugging and interpretability remain challenging. When a DRL agent behaves unexpectedly, understanding why can be difficult due to the complex, often opaque nature of deep neural networks. This lack of transparency can be a major barrier in safety-critical applications where understanding and verifying the agent's decision-making process is paramount. This is why DRL struggles in domains like training aircraft pilots where learning through failure is unacceptable, or in environments with extremely sparse rewards (like the classic Atari game Montezuma's Revenge) where meaningful feedback is rare, making learning incredibly slow.
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning
Given its strengths in handling complexity and learning optimal strategies, it's no surprise that Deep Reinforcement Learning has moved beyond theoretical research and found practical applications across a remarkable range of industries. Its ability to optimize sequential decision-making in dynamic environments makes it a powerful tool for tackling real-world challenges. Let's explore some prominent examples:
Gaming and Simulation:
This is perhaps the most famous arena for DRL breakthroughs. Google DeepMind's AlphaGo serves as an iconic example. It stunned the world by defeating champion Lee Sedol at Go, not by brute-forcing calculations, but by using deep neural networks to evaluate board positions (value network) and suggest moves (policy network). Crucially, it learned and refined its strategy through extensive self-play, discovering powerful tactics beyond human intuition. Similarly, DRL agents have achieved superhuman performance in complex video games like Atari classics, Dota 2, and StarCraft II, learning directly from pixel inputs or game state information to master intricate strategies and long-term planning.
Robotics and Autonomous Control:
DRL is revolutionizing how robots learn skills. Instead of painstakingly programming every movement, robots can learn complex tasks like grasping diverse objects, locomotion (walking or flying), and navigation through trial-and-error in simulation or the real world. Companies are using DRL to train robotic arms for intricate assembly tasks in manufacturing or for sorting items in warehouses.
Autonomous Vehicles:
While fully autonomous driving involves many components, DRL plays a role in specific decision-making processes. For instance, it can be used to optimize complex maneuvers like lane changing, merging in dense traffic, or path planning in unpredictable environments, learning policies that balance safety, efficiency, and comfort.
Finance and Trading:
DRL excels at developing optimal trading strategies in the complex, dynamic financial markets. DRL-powered agents analyze vast amounts of market data and indicators to decide when to buy, sell, or hold assets, aiming to maximize returns while managing risk and adapting as conditions evolve.
Recommender Systems and Marketing:
Platforms use DRL to move beyond simple recommendations and optimize for long-term user satisfaction and engagement. In marketing, DRL can optimize advertising spend allocation or personalize marketing campaign strategies in real-time based on user interactions.
Resource Management and Optimization:
A compelling real-world success is Google's application of DRL to optimize the cooling systems in its data centers. The DRL system learned complex control policies for managing cooling units based on server loads, weather conditions, and other factors, analyzing sensor data to predict future temperatures and adjust equipment settings. This resulted in significant energy savings, demonstrating DRL's potential for large-scale industrial optimization. Similar principles apply to optimizing energy grids or logistics networks.
For those looking to apply these concepts, "Grokking Deep Reinforcement Learning" by Miguel Morales is a practical resource worth exploring. Its strength lies in combining clear explanations with hands-on, annotated Python code examples. This approach makes it particularly helpful for developers wanting to understand and implement DRL algorithms themselves.
Conclusion
And there you have it – a look into the exciting field of Deep Reinforcement Learning. We've journeyed through how it cleverly brings together the world of Deep Learning, with its powerful neural networks skilled at finding patterns in complex data, and Reinforcement Learning's fundamental approach of learning through trial-and-error and feedback. It's this combination that gives DRL its edge, allowing agents to learn effective strategies directly from raw, messy inputs like sensor data or screen pixels, tackling problems that were once out of reach for AI.
We saw how these agents learn iteratively, interacting with their environment, using rewards and penalties to fine-tune their actions, all while managing that tricky balance between using what they know (exploitation) and trying new things (exploration). While DRL's ability to handle complex, dynamic situations has led to impressive applications in areas ranging from robotics and gaming to finance and resource optimization, we also acknowledged the real hurdles it faces, particularly around the sheer amount of data needed for learning and ensuring training stability. Understanding the basic building blocks – agents, environments, actions, rewards, and the underlying MDP framework – gives us a solid foundation for appreciating both its potential and its complexities.
As this field continues to grow, DRL is paving the way for increasingly adaptive and intelligent AI systems across many domains.
Add a comment